Who's your choice for Mayor in 2015?

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Vote for Walter Bailey on May 4.

Well, the things you learn when you're out and about......

The 5-3 vote taken tonight to eject JW Gibson from the District 2 race and Johnny Hatcher, Jr from the District 3 race were of the right mind, but way too late. Why? This should have been done within a week after the filing deadline, and the window for removing candidates from the ballot has CLOSED. Once you are within 40 days of the election (and we ARE), you CANNOT remove someone from the ballot.

So, they're apparently stuck on the ballot.

Guess what? So are Walter Bailey and Cleo Kirk!

That's right, gentle readers, Walter Bailey will still be on the District 2 ballot, and Cleo Kirk will still be on the District 3 ballot, and if you live in one of those districts, you can vote for them.

They could even WIN; they just couldn't serve.

OK, Cracker, let's say that happens, what would happen THEN? Well, should Mr. Bailey or Mr. Kirk win their race on May 4, it would fall to your friendly neighborhood SCDP ExecCom to choose the Democratic nominee for the August general election!

That's right, folks, if they so chose, Walter Bailey and Cleo Kirk could go out and campaign with the idea that if they won, the ExecCom would choose the nominee. Twisted? You bet! Possible? This is Big Shelby, people, what do YOU think?

To quote the late Dr. Hunter S. Thompson, "When the going gets tough, the weird turn pro!"

This also means that Sidney Chism is not necessarily an elected County Commissioner just yet, he has to campaign against someone who could beat him, but not hold the seat!

Think this couldn't happen? Remember when John Ashcroft lost his US Senate seat in Missouri to a DEAD MAN, the late Mel Carnahan? The Missouri Democratic Party then chose his widow, Jean, to hold the seat.

Even more recently, Cook County (IL) Board President John Stroger had a near-fatal stroke that kept him from campaigning for re-election against his Democratic primary challenger, Forrest Claypool. However, the Cook County Central Committee campaigned mightily for him, and he won.

Mind you, he will probably announce (AFTER the election is certified) that he is physically unable to run. Who will decide who the Democratic nominee is? you guessed it, the Cook County Central Committee!

Am I advocating this policy? I'll leave that up to you.

However, if the SCDP wants to get itself out of a predicament that they got themselves into when, in reality, the Primary Board didn't check these people out as they should have (OK, send me your emails!), they could do worse than to "suggest" that Democrats vote for the incumbents on May 4.

Don't you just LOVE Shelby County politics?

13 comments:

BraveCordovaDem said...

I attended the meeting last night, as an observer, but had to leave before the vote. I am very surprised that the vote was that close on Gibson. He is clearly a Republican who is running as a Dem ONLY because he has no chance as a Repub. Hatcher said he essentially made a stupid mistake which one could give him the benefit of the doubt.

BUT the Steering Committee is a very timid one as evidenced form the Richard Fields affair.

My question for those of you who are smarter than me, could the SCDP vote to remove them, then if they actually won, choose another candidate in their place, not allowing them to run in the general as the Democratic nominee?

Ms. Termitator said...

The waste-of-time 5-to-3 vote that was made last night, was merely a recommendation from a committee that would have had to go before the full 60 plus Shelby County Democratic Party's Executive Committee to vote up or down.

Evil said...

Well, it was also a waste of time because they can't take anyone off the ballot this late.


Nice to meet you last night, Cracker.

polar donkey said...

The Memphis Labor Council endorsed Klerk and not Chism. I'm pro-labor and if they endorsed Klerk I trust their judgement. Go Klerk! I am completely cool with forcing the Shelby County Democratic Party Executive Committee into making difficult decisions. Public, difficult decisions allows people to see just how dysfunctional it is. By forcing people to take stands in public, you will also get a peek at what actually motivates ExCom members. Normally, all you get is empty rhetoric and then behavior that counters that behind closed doors. Anarchy, I say abso-fucking-lutely make it happen.

NO cracker Just SOBER said...

You guys seem politically astute,so please refresh my memory and define DEMOCRACY. While you're at it, explain to me what grounds ANY committee had to deny these two County Commissioner Candidates(Gibson & Hatcher) the right to run for office.

I find it appalling that some would rather see a "committe" select the next Commissioner rather than abide by the voters choice. Again I ask ...define Democracy ?

LeftWingCracker said...

What grounds? State law gives each party the right to determine WHO can run under their banner.

What do you think would have happened if, in 2004, I suddenly filed in 2004 after 25 years of Democratic work and support for a Republican primary office?

They would have booted me in 30 seconds.

Parties MATTER, bubba. Other than Bernie Sanders, name me a high-level Independent office holder in this country.

Go ahead, I can wait......

Well, other than my Socialist friend Bernie, there aren't any. Either of these fellows could have filed as Independents, but they didn't, because they know that that way lies OBLIVION.

If either of them had come in, helped Democratic candidates with work and/or money this time and stayed away from the GOP, we're actually a pretty forgiving bunch.

But YOU HAVE TO PAY YOUR DUES. You can't just walk in after 12 years as a Republican (the last 2 on their STEERING Committee) and then file as a Democrat and then DARE US TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?

BULLSHIT.

No cracker just Sober said...

OK...So you CAN'T define DEMOCRACY !

LeftWingCracker said...

Have you ever heard of REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY, pal?

The Democrats of those locations elected people to the Executive Committee to make such decisions IN THE EVENT IT BECAME NECESSARY.

Again, as you obviously FAILED to read, the TCA gives each party the right to determine WHO runs as a Democrat.

Next!

No cracker just Sober said...

You are obviously struggling with my initial question so allow me to help.
de·moc·ra·cy [ di mókrəssee ] (plural de·moc·ra·cies)
noun
Definitions:
1. free and equal representation of people: the free and equal right of every person to participate in a system of government, often practiced by electing representatives of the people by the majority of the people

However,you make an interesting point when you mention the responsibilitiy of the Executive Committee "In the event it became necessary." I'm going to take a leap of faith and ask another question. What "event" necessiates such action? When someone enters the race that the committee doesn't approve of their previous political alliances OR when the favored incumbent is challenging a choice the voters have already made? If your answer is "BOTH" then why didn't the Committe act before NOW? If the answer is "NEITHER" then let's take this dance(our difference of opinion) to the party(POLLS)!

One other thought. It seems that most of your comments are based on emotions. I'm just having a hard time discerning which!

LeftWingCracker said...

And you are obviously struggling with the idea of REPRESENTATIVE democracy.

This is a PRIMARY. This is the business of the DEMOCRATIC PARTY. When a REPUBLICAN attempts to run as a DEMOCRAT it is the responsibility of the PARTY to remove people who are seeking the DEMOCRATIC nomination who have been REPUBLICAN.

You are the one having the understanding problem, sport.

RAM said...

To SOBER, if you had been at the steering committee meeting where it was recommended to remove these two opportunists, you would have voted the same way the committee voted. Neither one has come around any meetings, etc. that include Democrats. Hatcher is against same sex marriage which is a human rights issue, and Gibson likes the fiscal policy of the Republicans so I guess that leaves out the living wage issue. Gibson was on the Republican Committee all the way up to 2005. If he wants to be a Democrat, that's great, but where has he been this last year? Hatcher said he ran against Steve Cohen because someone had to go against gay marriage? Asked if he had won, would he have switched back to the Democrat party, he said if it would have gotten a majority in the Senate for the Democrats, he would have. I doubt that. Neither could explain really why they had left the Democrat Party in the first place and run as Independents.

No cracker just Sober said...

I am the first to admit that I'm not"politically savy". I am however a voting citizen with a reasonable amount of intelligence, asking common sense questions. I do understand Representative democracy but I don't understand why this "representative " group did not take action EARLIER if "they had a leg to stand on."
It seems to me that should be the issue. Their inaction gave the perception of acceptance and allowed these candidates to move forth. Where's the leadership there?
Ram, I appreciate the points you made regarding very important political issues. I also appreciate the fact that the Democractic Party wants to support those who have supported the party.I don't agree that the party should "boot" talent because they haven't been graced by the "bunch of forgiving guys." (quote from Cracker). Based on this fiasco,looks the party can use all the talent it can get.

MOON said...

牙醫,植牙,矯正,矯正牙齒,批發,皮膚科,痘痘,中醫,飛梭雷射,毛孔粗大,醫學美容,痘痘,肉毒桿菌,seo,關鍵字行銷,自然排序,網路行銷,自然排序,關鍵字行銷seo,部落格行銷,網路行銷,seo,關鍵字行銷,自然排序,部落格行銷,網路行銷,牛舌餅婚紗台中婚紗,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,腳臭,高雄婚紗,街舞,小產,雞精,性感,辣妹,雷射溶脂,雙下巴,抽脂,瘦小腹,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,淨膚雷射,清潔公司,居家清潔,牙周病,牙齒矯正,植牙